🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, including domestic abuse, following extensive and intense discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, requiring authorities to develop laws and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its emphasis on gender equality undermines traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread outcry both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 individuals have signed a Latvian petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a demonstration for next Thursday, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the vote did not achieve a supermajority majority, the president could potentially send back the bill for further consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another component of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires specific safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's vote could affect comparable debates in other member states